Listing of Entries Tagged as ''

Chown that file!

All you n00b server lords out there (like me):

Learn how to chown that file!
[user@localhost]$ chown theuser thefilemask

I recently came across a problem related to one of our custom CMS builds. For the browser user upload of images, the PHP application wrote an image file to the webserver with the owner set to ”apache” (I guess that’s because the PHP processes run as instances in the Apache server). So, when I tried to copy the apache-owned images via FTP to my local drive, it would not allow me ’cause I was logged on as the FTP user. That’s a problem if you’re migrating a site from a dev environment to a live environment on another server half way around the world.

So, rather than muck about with permissions, etc., I simply logged into our server via a shell, and changed the owner of all the images in question to the user account I’m using for FTP access. Done and done. FTP all good. Migration all good.

So far.

 

Flash MP3 Player

Flash MP3 Player : This seems like a nice quick solution, with a JavaScript customization API and blog plugins!! Sweet!

Thanks to Darren from OpenRoad for the tip.

Shame on You, Copy Writer

Here’s an example of misleading IA/UI: http://www.gamespot.com/misc/top100_pop.html

“Most Popular Games”?? I don’t think so. Try “Most Popular Game Details Pages on Our Site”. Cause today it ranked “Halo 3″ as #4, and I damn well know that the third Master Chief installment ain’t even close to being released!

(Note the tiny “Ranking based on GameSpot traffic” text under the title.)

Funworld

NPD Funworld : Looks like this is the resource for gaming sales stats and other industry tidbits. If you have the dough to pay for it. And toys. Also interesting are stats on Canadian diet: http://www.npdcanada.com/store.food.html

Game Design With Agile Methodologies

Gamasutra - Feature - “Paper Burns: Game Design With Agile Methodologies”

This article talks about the ”Agile” development method, as applied to game development. I can see this as quite applicable to interactive design. We kind of work this way already (though on a much, much smaller scale): we rapid prototype, get the client involved early and often, work flexibly, and test throughout.

The one thing this article alludes to but doesn’t answer to my satisifaction is how costs are controlled. Yes, the traditional ”Waterfall” method (akin to an assembly line) may be inefficient and lead to degraded products, but how does one plan and budget for the potentially limitless iterations of Agile? This may not be an issue in game design, but for projects with strictly fixed budgets and deadlines, I can’t see how this is “controlled” effectively.

Perhaps, I’m just not getting the point that this methodology may apply more for large teams developing really large, really complex projects.

Still, it’s nice to see our approach validated, even if not directly.

Process, and File Conventions / Organization

When it comes to structuring projects and active source code, I try to lean towards simple and semantic. Mostly.

We’re in the middle of upgrading our office IT infrastructure, so I’m taking the opportunity to overhaul our weak, inconsistent, all-too-organic and out-dated organizational system.

No small task.

I think our biggest problem in this area is the challenge of consistency, given the broad nature of our projects, which include Motion Graphics, Web Development, and Print. Our process flow (per project) can change as well. Sometimes we’re implenting existing art direction and sometimes we’re generating concept and IP from scratch. How does one quantify all these variables into something consistent and understandable.

And why the fuss, you ask?

Several reasons, including:

  • Less work. Currently, it feels like we’re creating new processes and workflows from scratch with each project.
  • Easier collaboration. If everything’s consistent, then team members, both internal and external, can work together easier.
  • Less screw-ups and less redundancy (means higher efficiency)
  • Because our memory ain’t so good. We forget what we did how and why only a few days after a project is done. Nevermind a year later.
  • Little client updates and changes (the things that can end being the most unprofitable and disruptive) become a snap.

Here’s what some people have to say on the matter:

Something else I wrestle with is how tightly to integrate our file structures and organizational schemes with our idealized mod7 ”Process“. My definition of process (in the context of design) is: a system or set of activities that brings about a logical set of solutions to a given need or problem. At my process lectures, I talk about an “activities template”:

  • Research
  • Rapid Prototyping
  • Concept and Style
  • Iterations & Blueprinting
  • Production
  • Execution / Publishing
  • Wrap-Up / Analysis (which, by the way, we never do enough of, if at all)

Each of these activites employ the classic design subcycle:

  • Discover
  • Prototype
  • Test

The ideal convention will also be self-documenting. You shouldn’t need to go through a project later to “clean it up”; chuck out stray files, rename oddly-named comps (finalfinal2b.psd), write a ton of explanatory docs. A good system, when followed, should eliminate all that.

A good system should also be flexible enough to encourage play and unexpected discovery.

Sounds easy enough.

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0084726/

Man, who would’ve thought that Moby Dick could sound so frickin’ wikkid oozing off the lips of the Fantasy Island guy?

Khan

“From hell’s heart, I stab at thee. For hate’s sake, I spit my last breath at thee.”

Awww, dag! That’s rad.

This film is simply the pinnacle of the Star Trek universe, and one of the all-time best sci-fi movies made, ever. Yeah, punk, I’ll stand by that statement until I die. And, funny enough, I loved this movie the first 800 times I watched on HBO back in 1983 (it was shown along with other not-so-popular line-ups, Oliver Twist, Gay Superman, and The Unfunny Muppets). I was 9. And I still like, nay, LOVE, this movie today.

The Day the Earth Stood Still

http://imdb.com/title/tt0043456/

Klaatu barada nikto. Learn it. Love it.

This film is a triumph of the theremin, and is required viewing for all sci-fi geeks everywhere. Seriously, this is one rockin’ sci-fi flick.

Gort and my man, Klaatu

The Fugitive

http://imdb.com/title/tt0106977/

“Get off my plane!”

Woops, wrong movie.
Harrison in a photo booth
This one had, “I didn’t kill my wife!”… followed by the brilliant retort,

“I don’t care”

Oh, Tommy, you’re SO badass.

Catch Me if You Can

http://imdb.com/title/tt0264464/

This is a great movie to watch with your mother-in-law.

The titles are great, in that classic Saul-Bass-meets-the-Pink-Panther kind of way. A joy to watch in itself.

Titles Shot

Ran

http://imdb.com/title/tt0089881/

I thought this was made in like 1968, or something. As such, it felt like a fantastic watch.

Then I find out it was released in 1985. A bit of a disappointment, because I always thought this was the inspiration for Lucas and Star Wars. Doing the math, it’s clear I made a moronic assumption. Apparently, that honor belongs to Akira Kurosawa’s other epic films, Kakushi-toride no san-akunin (The Hidden Fortress, 1958), Tsubaki Sanjûrô (Sanjuro, 1962), and Yojimbo (The Bodyguard, 1961). Films I now must add to our collection.

Still, don’t let that dissuade you from watching and enjoying the film. This Shakespeare adaptation was truly a fanatical masterwork. It’s deserving of your adoration: Akira storyboarded every shot in the film with paintings (it took 10 years, apparently), and his wife even died during its making (Akira took the day off).

Another attempt at CSS rounded-corner dialogs using the sliding doors technique

Another attempt at CSS rounded-corner dialogs using the sliding doors technique

Scott Schiller rocks out with some rad rounded corners. I used this on a client backend (those things are good for trying out stuff you wouldn’t unleash on the world yet) with an impressively high success rate. Simple to replicate, too.

The only bummer is you still need crazy extra HTML elements that muck up your otherwise clean and solid structure.

He mentions a JavaScript-based solution that he developed, which he now poo-poos. I think I’ll try it out anyway.

CSS Equal Height Columns

Projectseven.com - Tutorials: CSS Equal Height Columns

Fancy-dancy animated JavaScript. Uses JavaScript to separate behaviour from presentation (CSS) and structure (HTML). Nice.

This approach blows less hard than the “faux column” trick, which always reeked of single-pixel-GIF-era code hackery to me.

How to size text using ems | clagnut/blog

How to size text using ems | clagnut/blog

This is Richard Rutter’s “font sizing method”. Seems a bit too fudgy for my taste. And lot’s of inheritance issues to contend with. Yuck.

Making a CSS-based layout start to finish

design in-flight: Soup to Nuts: Making a CSS-based layout start to finish

This is an excellent and simple article on designing CSS-based layouts. This is very similar to our internal development workflow for this sort of thing, but better documented! ;)

The idea of logical HTML labeling and global-to-local, hierarchical CSS development is critical knowledge.

Reading this won’t solve some of the trickier visual issues we regularly encounter and it’s certainly not the only way to do things, but, as a primer, it rules.

Wil’s Fave Quotes of the Day

That Bing Gordon is a smart guy.

From: Game Tycoon Interview with Bing Gordon (EA), here are my fave Gordonisms:

Fave business quote of the day:

“Once you find out that the trick to business is making ‘marginal revenue equal marginal cost’, the rest of financial planning is conceptually easy.”

Fave creative quote of the day:

“The trick to finishing any creative project on schedule is to ship whatever is done by a given date. This is what advertising agencies usually do with the commercials they create. Of course, no one remembers that it was on time after it fails miserably.”

Fave strategy quote of the day:

“I think our industry’s greatest challenge is to transition from technology-based to creativity-based experiences.”

(That’s not just hype-jargoning—think about it for sec, and how it applies to creating a mainstream business advantage.)

Fave interesting-way-to-look-at-it quote of the day:

“Our industry’s biggest business challenge is to figure out how to convince consumers to pay ‘fair value’ for the increased quality we are delivering. We need to monetize our ‘excess hours’ of satisfied play. Our best games are unbelievably cheap on a per hour basis, compared to, say $1.00 per hour for paperback books, and $5-10 an hour for movies and DVD’s.”

The name of this class conflicts with the name of another class

Finally, an answer to this retarded Flash issue.

ActionScript that Converts UTM to Lat/Long

Working on some dynamic Flash mapping, I found out how nuts the mapping world is. “Oh yeah, converting from UTM coordinates (those used in many GPS systems) to Lat and Long in Flash, dynamically and in real-time, won’t be a big deal.”

It was a little trickier than anticipated.

But hard work prevailed!

And luck—for this particular project, the conversions were limited to one geographic area of the world (British Columbia, Canada), so the usual fudging that happens in making map calculations work is limited. I managed to work through this, culling from various cartography sites (they do this stuff in high school??), and got my head wrapped around this… in about three hours. So much for a simple formula. Who would have thought that the earth is not a perfect sphere?

Anyways, for any of you that need to do something similar someday, I present these three ActionScript functions to help you along (but please don’t ask me for tech support!).


function UTMtoLatLong (zone, easting, northing) {
// GRS 80 datum
a = 6378137; // equatorial radius
// b = 6356752.3141 // polar radius
// Flattening : 1/298.257222101

long0 = ((UTMzonetoNum(zone)-1)*6)-180+3; // central meridian of zone
k0 = 0.9996; // scale along long0
onef = 298.257223563;
e2 = 2*(1/onef)-Math.pow((1/onef),2);
// This is the eccentricity of the earth's elliptical cross-section.
ex2 = e2/(1-e2);

ny = northing;
nx = easting-500000; // (relative to central meridian; subtract 500,000 from conventional UTM coordinate).

// Calculate the Meridional Arc
M = ny/k0;

// Calculate Footprint Latitude (fp)
mu = M/(a*(1 - e2/4 - 3*Math.pow(e2,2)/64 - 5*Math.pow(e2,3)/256));
e1 = (1-Math.sqrt(1-e2))/(1+Math.sqrt(1-e2));
J1 = (3*e1/2 - 27*Math.pow(e1,3)/32);
J2 = (21*Math.pow(e1,2)/16 - 55*Math.pow(e1,4)/32);
J3 = (151*Math.pow(e1,3)/96);
J4 = (1097*Math.pow(e1,4)/512);
fp = mu + J1*Math.sin(2*mu) + J2*Math.sin(4*mu) + J3*Math.sin(6*mu) + J4*Math.sin(8*mu);

// Calculate Latitude and Longitude
C1 = ex2*Math.pow((Math.cos(fp)),2);
T1 = Math.pow((Math.tan(fp)),2);
R1 = a*(1-e2)/Math.pow((1-e2*Math.pow((Math.sin(fp)),2)),3/2);
N1 = a/Math.pow((1-e2*Math.pow(Math.sin(fp),2)),1/2);
D = nx/(N1*k0);

Q1 = N1*Math.tan(fp)/R1;
Q2 = (Math.pow(D,2)/2);
Q3 = (5 + (3*T1) + (10*C1) - Math.pow((4*C1),2) - 9*ex2)*Math.pow(D,4)/24;
Q4 = (61 + 90*T1 + 298*C1 + 45*Math.pow(T1,2) - 3*Math.pow(C1,2) - 252*ex2)*Math.pow(D,6)/720;
Q5 = D;
Q6 = (1 + 2*T1 + C1)*Math.pow(D,3)/6;
Q7 = (5 - 2*C1 + 28*T1 - 3*Math.pow(C1,2) + 8*ex2 + 24*Math.pow(T1,2))*Math.pow(D,5)/120;

lat = radiansToDegrees(fp - Q1 * (Q2 - Q3 + Q4));

long = long0 + radiansToDegrees((D-(1+2*T1+C1)*(Math.pow(D,3))/6 + (5-2*C1+28*T1-3*Math.pow(C1,2)+8*ex2+24*Math.pow(T1,2))*(Math.pow(D,5))/120)/Math.cos(fp));

return (lat+'|'+long);
};

function UTMzonetoNum (zone:String) {
// note: currently returns a string, not an integer
for (i=0; i if (zone.charAt(i) == ' ') {
zoneNum = (zone.slice(0,i));
return zoneNum;
break;
}
}
};

function radiansToDegrees (radians:Number) {
degrees = radians/(Math.PI/180);
return (degrees);
};

There you go—enjoy!

Gear Live | BumpTop - An Alternative Desktop Interface

http://www.gearlive.com/index.php/news/article/bumptop-alternative-desktop-interface-06210627/

Ok, this is wicked. At first glance it seems like a corny Blackjack interface. But it’s all in the interaction, baby. This is the kind of stuff I was dreaming about in 1998. Looks like computer horsepower is starting to allow realtime manipulation in virtual space.

Of course, the ultimate goal here is to break this out of the virtual world altogether, and do this kind of stuff with smart, networked computer screen paper.

Snap! That’s Some Hot Motion Graphics

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsE0g-8CDQo&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eheavy%2Dbackpack%2Ecom%2F

Minority Report pervades everything. Kind of amazing, considering what a dull movie that was. I guess when you assemble a futurist think tank to help with your envisioning, you’re bound to make an impact—despite terrible source material.

AIGA | AQUENT

http://www5.designersalaries.com/aigaaquent/Home.form

Interesting to compare this against: http://www.sprokit.ca/page.php?id=25

FlashXP: The name of this class conflicts with the name of another class

http://www.epresenterplus.com/blog/archives/000030.html

Finally, an answer to this retarded issue!

The Princess Bride

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093779/

Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Chills up my spine, man.

Chown that file!

http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/php/2003/02/06/php_foundations.html

[user@localhost]$ chown theuser thefilemask

Sideways

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0375063/

Oscar buzz usually wrecks a film for me. Thankfully, the hype machine didn’t stop me from liking this movie. It’s funny and sadly familiar. So familiar, in fact, that I’m inspired to write a screenplay about the idiots in my life. And also inspired to learn how to use words like “thin-skinned”, “temperamental”, “survivor”, “fullest expression”, “haunting”, “brilliant”, “subtle”, “thrilling” and “ancient” when describing the taste of wine.

The Mummy Returns

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0209163/

We bought this one about four years ago. Twice since, we’ve tried to watch it in its entirety. And twice, we’ve fallen asleep before we could get to the mid-point. But don’t let that disuade you. It’s probably a great sequel. Just don’t start watching it too late in the evening.

In Good Company

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0385267/

Despite the retarded premise, the film’s structure actually hangs together quite well. And the ending was quite a departure from the typical baby-boomer-targeted mid-life-crisis movie.

But none of that saves it. Don’t watch this film. Unless it’s on TV. Or you borrow it from some poor schmo that happened to buy it. Like us.

Sin City

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0401792/

Practically a shot-for-shot adaptation of Frank Miller’s graphic novel series, Sin City is graphically stunning. Almost as stunning as the graphic novels. Too bad the actors had to be in there. But, then, without them I guess you may as well just read the graphic novels and forget the film. Oh… that’s an interesting recommendation…

The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0167260/

Un-freakin-believably great. (Though the first is still my overall fave by a very, very, very narrow margin). The last-minute saves, exciting heroics, and epic camera work makes me want to weep. And everytime I watch the part where Gwendolyn (or Gwennevir, whatever her name was) cuts of the Naz-Gul’s head, and yells “I am no man!” and then proceeds in killing the unkillable Witch King by stabbing him in the face - yeah! - everytime I see that, I wish so hard that I was a woman.

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (Special Extended DVD Edition)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0167261/

Yeah, the splitting up of the magic dream team in the previous movie was a serious suck. How can you take the perfectly balanced band of wisdom, strength, pointy ears, archery, and short stubby people and then have them go their separate ways? What was J.R.R. thinking?

Well, the book turned out to be quite good anyway. The movie? It was still rockin’, but it was missing that “something special” (called editing). Overall, the film could’ve moved a bit brisker at the beginning. And less zooming helicopter shots of dudes on horses in New Zealand would’ve been nice, too.

Yet the Battle for Helm’s Deep makes the previous 3 hours of extra footage more than bearable. Man, that battle is the pinnacle of action films. Can anyone suggest another that rocked more? (Other than the battles in The Return of the King, of course).

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120737/

Oh, you know, this movie frickin’ rocked. Peter Hoang told me he fell asleep in the middle of it. How ironic: I guess I am a nerd, and he just looks like one.

I almost liked this one better than the two that followed (but you know what I once said about usually liking the beginnings of movies better than the endings). It had all the hallmarks of great fantasy:

  • the ultra super team of magic dudes, knights, dwarfs and elves;
  • a rich variety of terrain and topography;
  • mysterious ancient cities and fantastic hidden realms;
  • a setup that includes an apparently insurmountable quest;
  • rich and obscure lore;
  • super-demons with whips;
  • scary evil dudes in black hooded robes;
  • awesome heroics.

Oh yeah, I could watch this one over and over again. And I have. Unless you’re Pete, I can’t imagine why you wouldn’t like this flick.

Indiana Jones, the Adventures of (The Complete DVD Movie Collection)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082971/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087469/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097576/

The summary, according to everyone:

  • Raiders of the Lost Ark: Awesome, a classic.
  • The Temple of Doom: Sucks ass.
  • The Last Crusade: Ok, not as good as the first, better than the second.

The summary, according to me:

  • ROLA: Wicked awesome, a classic.
  • TOD: Wicked ass sucking.
  • TLC: Too much information. And who gives a crap about Indy as a hot young kid? But, otherwise thoroughly entertaining.

And, believe it or not, the 4th one is in the works. Besides powerfully evocative dialogue (Get off my plane.”), I’d be keen to see what action ol’ Harry Ford can muster at the age of 65 (which will be his approximate age by the time filming starts).

The Batman: The Rubber Face of Comedy and The Clay Face of Tragedy

This promotional DVD came with our copy of Batman Begins, and is part of the The Batman series. To be honest, I don’t remember if I watched these yet or not.

On a cool side note, The Edge wrote/performed the totally wicked theme song.

Batman Begins

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0450392/

Oh, holiest of holiest of Batman films, thou are truly worthy of watching over and over again.

Except for the end. Oh, how thou suckest, foul ending. DAMN!!!

On a related note, looks like the next installment is in the works.

Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0346156/

I think the hype and myth around this one was that some guy produced this in After Effects in his attic, or something. And it took him like 80 years to do it. Yet somehow, Jude Law, Gwyneth and Angelina get tapped for significant roles. An underground sensation? Hardly. A uniquely original voice? Barely. A visual feast? Certainly, but it depends on who you talk to.

As a source of significant inspiration for visual and motion designers (like myself), I give this film 700 thumbs-up. As a significant Film that makes you think for more than 30 seconds after the credits start rolling, I give this DVD -3 out of 10. Take that as you will.

But I’ll still be watching it again. Cause it’s a cool and fun adventure flick.

Shrek

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0126029/

This movie’s a moderately ok laugh. Eddie Murphy has found his niche as an ass. Or, I guess he’s solidified his niche. It’s been a few years since I’ve seen it, but I think I could sit through it again without poking my eyes out or falling asleep. That’s a good sign.

Why did we buy it? Don’t know, especially since we didn’t have kids at the time. That probably also meant we dropped good coin on it. Unless I got it for Christmas (which rings a bell, actually). In that case, I don’t know why I would have asked for this instead of something cool, like Blade Runner or bass strings.

Ironically, this is still probably a bit too scary for our kids (aged 14 months and 4.5 years).

Se7en

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114369/

Just saw this one the other week. This is another DVD that forms part of my Emily Carr class curriculum (seeing a pattern here, yet?). Mostly because of the ground-breaking titling by Kyle Cooper (Well, ground breaking for 1995).

After four years of CSI-driven explicit advanced in TV gore, this film was quite tame in comparison (they didn’t even show the de-capitated head!), but it made it all the more rich and rewarding. It’s a pretty good detective flick thriller thing all around.

Go buy it. It’s a cheap buy at your local BestBuy (or you can spend a little more and buy it online).

Aladdin (2 Disc Special Edition)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103639/

A gift to our daughter from one of my great friends, Luis. (Very sweet, that guy can be, when he’s not dragging me into the mire of fart jokes and Halo 2).

The Disney Vault. Funny monkey side-kicks. “A Whole New World”, performed by Nick Lachey and Jessica Simpson. “Proud of Your Boy,” performed by Clay Aiken. Need we say more?

One of the only truly evil aspects of parenting is having to sit through these kinds of movies with your kids. But at least they dig it, and that’s what counts, right?

VIDFEST 2006: mod7 Has Left the Building

VIDFEST wraps in style at the Radical-sponsored gala. And Wil and Eric’s Master Class presentation today was packed! The only sour note was the relative ass-kicking Wil received at the hands of Joshua Davis during a few competitive games of Robotron. (Thanks to Jason for the photos).

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory

http://imdb.com/title/tt0367594/

Johnny Depp, chocolate, little people in red suits. No, it’s not Chocolat (which we don’t own). But, other than squirrel’s nuts, this movie has little redeeming quality. Sure, it’s far better entertainment than the original. But, in my mind, that’s not a large complement.

JD gets mad props for his wicked Willy Wonka, the set design is all wonked-out in that wonderful Tim Burton style, and the little kid is just so loveably pathetic that you can’t help but love his genuine affection for the world. But, somehow all these pieces come together to form something less than the sum the parts. Too bad.

The Manchurian Candidate

http://imdb.com/title/tt0056218/

Whoa, this is some heavy stuff for old Franky boy. Brain-washing, psychological games, war in Korea… and where’s the skinny black guy with the glass eye?

I’m sure this movie was a riveting hard-hitter back in its day. Not today. Don’t waste your time.

(Note of Disclaimer: I’m writing this a full year after actually watching it, so maybe I was just in a bad mood, or something.)

The Pink Panther Strikes Again

http://imdb.com/title/tt0075066/

We just watched this one a couple weeks ago. Even though it’s relatively short, we had to watch it in two nights (Battlestar Galactica was on).

Peter Sellers is a comic genius. Pure and simple. I don’t think Annette got into the physical comedy so much, but that’s because she couldn’t appreciate the pure artistry of the timing and restraint required to pull off such convincing theatre.

Meh, must be a guy thing.

Anyway, the opening credits were really cool, I might have to show this to my Design for Motion students. Less time I need to fill the air with actually teaching.

Signs

http://imdb.com/title/tt0286106/

Oh, I just love M. Night. Shamamamallyaaannananan’s movies. But I’m probably biased cause I grew up in the Philadelphia area, where most of his films are set. To anyone else that didn’t grow up in Philly: do you like his movies?

Signs was great (well, good) for more reasons than I liked seeing the Philly area or that M. is a great filmmaker (I show his movies in my Design for Motion class). I liked the religious overtones, the ideas that purpose can be found in the seemingly mundane or insignificant things, and aliens. I kind of like aliens. Sometimes.

The end was a dissappointment (as with most of M.’s films, for me, anyway) — mostly because the sense of mystery so carefully crafted throughout the first 90% of the film was just dumped. But I guess that’s my complaint with almost every film. I need to make films. Films that start mysterious and compelling, and somehow end that way, too.

Screw getting all the answers, nice and neat at the end. I want to live in that world and feel like that world continues to live after the credits roll.

Fight Club

http://imdb.com/title/tt0137523/

This movie, I’m proud to say, we paid FULL PRICE for. Like, $30 or something. And I’d do it again. Not only for the great walkthrough Ikea catalogue scene (which, by the way, is what our apartment looks like), not just because of it’s eerily prophetic vision of a new world that’s ushered in by terrorists collapsing skyscrapers, not just because of Brad Pitt’s pecks (hey, I’m comfortable enough in my heterosexuality to say that Brad has some nice pecks), not just because of the brilliant writing, and not just because they make that soap with old lady fat.

Well, ok, it’s just because of those things.

And also because the Ed/Brad character taps into that no fear, you-can-do-it-on-your-own, DIY, attitude that I look for in myself (but can’t seem to find — maybe I need an alter ego?). I mean, come on — it’s pretty cool that a scrawny, average guy like Ed boldly takes over a deserted potentially druggie-infested house, raises a national cell-based terrorist army, and finds his inner penguin, while nailing whats-her-name all day and night. Where does the guy find the time?

Oh yeah, he doesn’t sleep.

Truly inspiring.

Shrek 2

http://imdb.com/title/tt0298148/

The sticker on the DVD case says “Previously Enjoyed $14.99″. Why the hell did we pay $14.99 for this movie, again? Oh yeah, the fart jokes. And because we couldn’t own Shrek without owning the sequel now, could we?

Spiderman 2

http://imdb.com/title/tt0316654/

Whoa, we have Spiderman 2?! I think I got this for Christmas a while back, cause I couldn’t think of what to ask for and I saw it onsale in some flyer lying around. I did like this movie, and (showing my true fanboy geek colours here) my eyes kinda watered at that part in the subway train, when he saves everyone and his mask falls off and everyone sees who he is but they all make a pact to keep his identity a secret. Moving stuff.

Not that it made a diff in the long run, suckers.

Lost in Translation

http://imdb.com/title/tt0335266/

Bill Murray can do no wrong. He’s so funny even when he’s not trying to be. That’s genius. I love the use of color in this film. Making fun of other cultures is always good for a cheap laugh, too, no matter how much you wrap that up in art film pretensions. You can’t go wrong with karaoke, either. And Scarlett Johansson is in her underwear a lot. It’s been a few years since I’ve seen the movie, so that’s all I can say about it for now, ’cause that’s all I remember.

We must watch this one again (especially since it’s required viewing for my Designing for Motion students — yikes!) and I’ll get back to you on this.

Who are the bloggers at e-Church? @ e-Church - find, write and share spiritual blogs

http://www.e-church.com/Blog.asp?EntryID=4

“At this time, we are looking for the following qualities in potential bloggers:

:: Passion for a deeper spiritual life
:: Frequently uses the Internet at work and home
:: Enjoys writing and has journaled
:: Desire to seek spiritual formation in a community of peers and willing to covenant with others

Other qualities that might make you a good canidate for blogging at e-Church include:

:: You are an introvert and usually dislike sharing in the typical small groups
:: You desire to track your spiritual journal in a literary way
:: You enjoy the act of “linking” to other people and memes ”

Oh, I love some good geek humor.

http://abum.com/file/shadow/animations/17632.swf

Very nicely done.

GSD: Science On a Sphere

http://sos.noaa.gov/

Ok, I WANT one!

http://sos.noaa.gov/description.html
http://sos.noaa.gov/sosfaq.html

How to Write a Strong Value Proposition by Jill Konrath: The Sideroad

http://www.sideroad.com/Sales/value_proposition.html

“A value proposition is a clear statement of the tangible results a customer gets from using your products or services. The more specific your value proposition is, the better.”

You don’t have to be well liked to succeed

http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/15/magazines/business2/welllikedsuccess/index.htm

Some lovely anti-teamwork careerism.

Perhaps Steve Spurrier, the former Florida football coach who compiled a 122-27-1 record and won a national championship, puts it best. “If people like you too much,” he says, “it’s probably because they’re beating you.”

Power Up the MobileMUSE Motion Graphics

mod7 worked with MobileMUSE to help refine their message, drive their brand in new directions, and create a presentation delivered via Flash and mobile devices. Take a sneak peek: http://mod7.com/portfolio/mmuse/flash2006.

Chase, OK?

A += (B - A)/Constant

Secret Sauce: The Rise of Blizzard

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/issue/48/3

Secret sauce, eh?

Love the Web 2.0

Wil Arndt shares his thoughts on the marketing buzzword that is “Web 2.0″ on the communication design and brand blog, ideasonideas.com. Please leave your comments and join in the discussion!

Websites as graphs - an HTML DOM Visualizer Applet

http://www.aharef.info/static/htmlgraph/

Yeah. Cool.

Don’t know how accurate it is, though…

bit-tech.net | Why Web 2.0 will end your privacy

http://www.bit-tech.net/columns/2006/06/03/web_2_privacy/1.html

Another Wil talks about the darkside of Web 2.0: The ultra-marketing opportunities that these social networks create.

“When the Web 2.0 bubble bursts - when the massive buyouts are done, the millionaires are made and the sites we love today are in the hands of big business - the innovation will grind to a halt, and what’s left will be the endless grinding of the marketeering machine.”

Browsercam

http://www.browsercam.com/

From Jeff Weir: “Looks like it might be handy in seeing rendering differences between browsers.”

new siet this month promise kk??

http://www.wddg.com/newsietsoonk/

Man, that’s funny.

Web 2.0 is Bull, or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Web 2.0

“Web 2.0.”

I tend to involuntarily wince a little every time I hear that shallow buzzword these days. At the risk of sounding like a dick (or, worse, like a Gore), let me get one thing straight right off the bat: I was into the idea of Web 2.0 waaaay before you were.

Probably. [Read more →]